The All-Star starters voting is in, and Indiana Fever's superstar has made the cut for the third consecutive year. While the breakdown of the voting revealed that Caitlin Clark's impressive season was widely recognised by fans and media alike, the same cannot be said about her opponents, who match up against her on a nightly basis.
Throughout the 2026 WNBA season, Clark has averaged 21.2 points, four rebounds, and 8.2 assists per game. According to the majority of voters, these stats alone are enough to cement her place among the All-Star starters. The 24-year-old ranked second overall in the fan voting and third overall in media voting.
However, this was far from the case when her peers' votes were tallied, as Clark could only rank 11th overall in that category. This segment of the voting did not affect her ability to land the accolade, but in a weird sense, it should be the recognition that matters most to a player.
Clark is perceived differently among WNBA players
People have different opinions, and that's what makes sport so beautiful, but when it comes to voting, people carry similar views on which players deserve an All-Star place. Maybe a voter's top three selections will be ordered differently from another's, but the core of the list is often alike.
Caitlin Clark's situation appears to be far different from most. In this instance, Indiana's franchise star is recognised by fans and media as one of the most talented players in the league; however, the opponents that share the court with her do not place her on the same pedestal.
According to Alexa Philippou, just under half of the WNBA player body actually submitted their votes for the 2026 All-Star Game. In fact, some of the Los Angeles Sparks players did not receive their ballot, meaning they did not have the opportunity to have their voices heard on the matter.
Sources: A little less than half of the WNBA player body submitted voting ballots for starters ahead of this month's All-Star Game.
— Alexa Philippou (@alexaphilippou) July 3, 2026
Some Los Angeles Sparks players did not receive their ballots, which teams are responsible for distributing.
More:https://t.co/RVeJd3HgsI
An argument could be made that if the voting process were handled correctly, Caitlin Clark's player votes could have looked entirely different. Nevertheless, from the perspective of the athletes who did manage to submit their votes, it makes for pretty grim reading.
There could be several logical explanations for Clark's underappreciation. First and foremost, recency bias could be at play -- especially when it comes to Olivia Miles. It is hard not to appreciate the seamless transition that Minnesota's rookie has made from the NCAA to the WNBA.
Another reason could be the lack of defensive quality Clark has shown this season, alongside her high turnover rate. Her statistics may make for impressive reading, but the weaknesses she does display are highly detrimental to her team and won't help them make a push for a championship.
For one reason or another, Caitlin Clark is not admired by her peers. I am sure her extremely loyal fanbase will have their own assumptions, but there could be several reasons factored into their decision. Regardless of the situation, the Indiana Fever superstar has made it onto the All-Star starters list -- and that's all she will care about.
Add us as a preferred source on Google