NCAA tournament movement, and lack of info.
Love our 24/7 women’s basketball coverage? Join our Patreon now and support this work, while getting extra goodies and subscriber-only content for yourself.
I got a text from a WNBA interested party this weekend.
“Is Gustafson really only 6’3″?”
The answer? I don’t know. And really? The people who will be deciding when to draft Megan Gustafson don’t know, either.
More from WNBA
- Your Day in Women’s Basketball, September 29: Game five preview, Sun vs. Aces
- Your Day in Women’s Basketball, September 28: All-Rookie team announced
- Your Day in Women’s Basketball, September 25: Alyssa Thomas may not be human
- Your Day in Women’s Basketball, September 24: Playoff Stewie time
- Your Day in Women’s Basketball: Buzzer beaters and big-time blocks
“No, 6’4 probably,” a WNBA talent evaluator said. “But how they haven’t measured her height, weight, wingspan, standing vertical, etc. is beyond me.”
It’s absurd. There’s no combine. There’s nothing more scientific than sending Debbie Antonelli to a game with a tape measure. And don’t get me wrong: I’m all for deploying Debbie in any and all roles she chooses.
But Debbie Antonelli already has a job. (Like eight of them, actually.)
The league needs a combine. It’ll drive stories about the best new talent coming in. It’ll tie the league to the current March Madness in a way that benefits both the college and pro game. It’s an investment that will lead to better, more informed decisions by the league’s teams.
Because, right now? Teams deciding the future of one of the best players in the country are making that decision by getting up close and squinting.
So how are those decisions coming?
TO THE BIG BOARD WE GO!